Blog & Newsroom

Going Through a Divorce?

by | 27 Sep | Eric James, Taxes - Individual

 Protect Your Ability to Exclude the Gain on the Sale of Your Home

Divorce is a very stressful process.  Oftentimes, the potential tax consequences of selling a home with an appreciated value is one of the last items thought about and may be potentially overlooked. In certain situations, this can cause taxpayers to pay more tax than necessary
Couple_packing_boxes.jpg
While nobody wants to lose money on the sale of their home, it is important to also be cognizant of the fact that the IRS allows no benefit for the deductibility of losses on the sale of your personal residence.

The good news is that the potential negative consequences can be easily avoided with a little bit of proper planning ahead of time.  Learn how to protect yourself and lock in your exclusion on the gain realized from selling your home.

How to Qualify

The best place to start is by learning the basic tests the taxpayer needs to pass in order to qualify for the gain exclusion under Section 121.  These tests are the “ownership test” and the “use test”.  

  • The ownership test is passed if the taxpayer has owned the home for at least two out of the last five years ending on the date of sale.
  • The use test is passed if the taxpayer has used the home as a principal residence for two out of the last 5 years ending on the date of sale.

If both tests are met, the amount of gain that is eligible for exclusion is a very generous $500,000 for married couples filing jointly and $250,000 for those with a status of married filing separate or single. 

Related Read: The Tax Implications of Divorce

There are two scenarios that can arise when selling a home in a divorce situation.   The home can be sold before or after the divorce is finalized.   It is a very important distinction as things tend to get a little more complicated when the home is sold during a tax year after the divorce.

Sales Occurring Before the Divorce

Generally, there are very few issues that arise under this basic scenario and both spouses each may take advantage of their $250,000 gain exclusion.  This scenario typically arises when the details of the divorce agreement are still in dispute and the divorce is not yet finalized.  Under this scenario, since the marriage is still in force, the couple can either file jointly and take advantage of a $500,000 gain exclusion or file separately, with each spouse getting a $250,000 gain exclusion. 

Sales Occurring After the Divorce

Sales occurring after the divorce muddy up the waters and make the tax consequences a little more complex.  While this is a very common scenario, the potential damage can easily be eliminated by using a simple planning technique. Make sure you place a stipulation in the divorce agreement stating that the ex-spouse who is no longer living at the house still has the option to live there for a specified time period or until a certain event happens.  After this time period, you can then specify whether the house should be sold or if one ex-spouse is going to buy the other’s share of ownership, so that they can assume sole ownership of the property.  As long as you follow those two simple steps, you should be able to overcome most obstacles that could present themselves under these circumstances.  Looking at a few different examples is the best way to understand the rules that apply here.  We will limit the focus to the viewpoint on the nonresident ex, since this is the area where mistakes are most often made.

Sales Made Soon After the Divorce

When the sale of the residence occurs very soon after the divorce (within 3 years), it is generally pretty easy to qualify for the gain exclusion.  As is often the case, let’s assume that each spouse gets partial ownership of the home as part of the divorce settlement.  As long as both spouses lived in the home prior to the split and the house is sold within 3 years, both the ownership and use tests will be met and each spouse will be able to exclude up to $250,000 of gain.  If either spouse remarries before the sale occurs, then that spouse will get to enjoy a $500,000 exclusion.  This is extremely taxpayer friendly since the other spouse will not lose their exclusion as a result of this. 

Sales Made Years Later

The potential pitfall occurs when the home is sold many years after the divorce.  As in the previous example, let’s assume that both spouses still meet the ownership test.  However, after three years has passed, the nonresident-ex is considered to have failed the use test.  Now, when the home is sold, the nonresident ex will be taxed on his or her entire share of the gain.  This same result (in a more extreme way) would also occur if the nonresident ex is the sole owner of the home.  The good news is that you don’t have to do much to bring equity back to the situation.  Simply include the earlier mentioned stipulation allowing the nonresident ex to have the option to continue to live in the home.  Whether or not that actually happens does not matter for purposes of the use test.  Never assume your attorney will automatically include this language in the divorce decree. 

As you can see, one should never go it alone or make such impactful financial decisions based on a quick internet search or watercooler chat. Our professionals have been retained by countless couples seeking beneficial solutions as they tread through a difficult time.

We, along with legal counsel, work collaboratively to determine which scenario will best reduce the tax obligations for each party.  To learn more, contact one of the tax professionals at Zinner & Co. at 216.831.0733 or ejames@zinnerco.com.  We’re happy to help and ready to start the conversation.

CTA_Tax_Team.jpg

Since 1938, Zinner has counseled individuals and businesses from start-up to succession. At Zinner, we strive to ensure we understand your business and recognize threats that could impact your financial situation.
Important Changes to the Deductibility of Employer-Provided Meals

On Jan. 1, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) significantly tightened the rules on the tax deductibility of employer-provided meals. If your business has historically relied on deductions for meals and food-related benefits, these changes require immediate...

Trump Accounts: The Future of Tax-Efficient Retirement Savings

Trump Accounts are a new type of tax-advantaged retirement account for minors, established under the One Big Beautiful Bill signed into law on July 4, 2025. With contributions of up to $5,000 per year and a potential $1,000 government seed contribution for eligible...

DOL Proposes New Independent Contractor Rule

What Employers and Workers Should Know The U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division announced a proposed rule intended to clarify when a worker is an employee and when the worker may be classified as an independent contractor under the Fair Labor Standards...

USPS Postmark Changes

A Tax Filing Risk Alert for Taxpayers For decades, many taxpayers have relied on a simple rule of thumb: if it is in the mail by the deadline, you are fine. However, recent U.S. Postal Service (USPS) clarification makes that assumption riskier. On Dec. 24, 2025, the...

Send us your questions and we’ll share our insights with you on our blog!

Share Your Idea For 
A Zinner Blog Article