Blog & Newsroom

Limiting Participant Loans to Active Employees

by | 13 Jan | Retirement Planning & IRAs

Most plan administrators and plan sponsors find participant loans to be a significant administrative challenge. To reduce the administrative burden and to make the loan program more cost effective, many 401(k) plans include provisions: (1) requiring payroll deduction to repay the loans, and (2) limiting the loans to active employees.

Must a plan make loans available to all participants?

No. However, the plan must satisfy the reasonably equivalent basis condition of the prohibited transaction requirements. To satisfy the “reasonably equivalent basis” condition, a plan must make loans to participants and beneficiaries available without regard to an individual’s race, color, religion, age, sex or national origin. The plan may take into consideration factors which a commercial institution in the business of making similar loans would consider, such as the applicant’s creditworthiness. In addition, the plan may consider financial need in determining loan availability.  

Under certain circumstances, uniformly applied loan requirements still might violate the requirement to make participant loans available on a reasonably equivalent basis, if the operation of the requirements results in a large percentage of plan participants not receiving loans. Of course a plan cannot make participant loans available to Highly Compensated Employees (HCEs) in a greater amount than to Non Highly Compensated Employees (NHCEs).

May a plan exclude former-employee participants from the plan’s participant loan program?

No. Under the “reasonably equivalent basis” rule, an employer may not design a loan program to exclude from eligibility all former-employee participants.  However, an employer may limit participant loans to former-employee participants who are parties in interest. Similar rules apply to beneficiaries of deceased employees and to alternate payees.
 

Since 1938, Zinner has counseled individuals and businesses from start-up to succession. At Zinner, we strive to ensure we understand your business and recognize threats that could impact your financial situation.
Important Changes to the Deductibility of Employer-Provided Meals

On Jan. 1, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) significantly tightened the rules on the tax deductibility of employer-provided meals. If your business has historically relied on deductions for meals and food-related benefits, these changes require immediate...

Trump Accounts: The Future of Tax-Efficient Retirement Savings

Trump Accounts are a new type of tax-advantaged retirement account for minors, established under the One Big Beautiful Bill signed into law on July 4, 2025. With contributions of up to $5,000 per year and a potential $1,000 government seed contribution for eligible...

DOL Proposes New Independent Contractor Rule

What Employers and Workers Should Know The U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division announced a proposed rule intended to clarify when a worker is an employee and when the worker may be classified as an independent contractor under the Fair Labor Standards...

USPS Postmark Changes

A Tax Filing Risk Alert for Taxpayers For decades, many taxpayers have relied on a simple rule of thumb: if it is in the mail by the deadline, you are fine. However, recent U.S. Postal Service (USPS) clarification makes that assumption riskier. On Dec. 24, 2025, the...

Send us your questions and we’ll share our insights with you on our blog!

Share Your Idea For 
A Zinner Blog Article